Counter-Strike: 3DMAX vs Liquid (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group B

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

3DMAX and Liquid are scheduled to meet in a best-of-three lower-bracket quarter-final at the CS Asia Championships group stage, with the winner staying alive and the loser eliminated from the bracket path. The crowd price around 55% for 3DMAX implies a narrow edge, but it is worth comparing that with conventional sportsbooks: on Betfair and Smarkets, traders usually see decimal prices first and must convert them to implied probability, while Polymarket displays the probability directly. That makes small moves easier to read, although fees differ and access is not identical: Polymarket is wallet-based and geo-restricted in some jurisdictions, whereas Betfair and Smarkets generally require full KYC and have broader local regulatory coverage. This is a match-up where the market is likely weighting recent head-to-head data heavily; 3DMAX beat Liquid 2-0 on 14 April 2026, according to EGamersWorld, which is a useful comparable because it shows this pairing has recently produced a clean result rather than a long, coin-flip series.

For traders, the main catalysts are whether the fixture stays on schedule and whether either side arrives with a different map pool or roster context than in the April meeting. The market description says settlement is 50-50 if the match is not played, or if it is delayed beyond seven days without a winner, so any official tournament schedule change matters. Liquipedia’s match listings show 3DMAX have been active in recent S-tier events, including IEM Rio 2026, which is relevant because form and travel load can shift a BO3 more than a single map. On the platform side, Polymarket will move in direct probability terms as news breaks, while on Kalshi, Betfair or Smarkets the same information usually appears as a change in contract price or odds, with fees and market depth affecting how quickly the visible number adjusts.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

We read Counter-Strike: 3DMAX vs Liquid (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group B from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live quote comes directly from the Polygon order book; the other three are listed with their platform attributes — fees, KYC, settlement currency, payment options — because a 1:1 contract comparison without API access would be guesswork.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.

Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.